<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Oct 1, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Edward Rudd wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div><div>On Oct 1, 2009, at 21:49 , Erick Calder wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Hello everyone,<br><br>mod_gnutls is a great solution and should be available as a standard <br>part of the various distributions out there. I've taken the trouble <br>to walk the module through the Fedora submission process - it is now <br>available in distributions F10, F11, F12 and Rawhide, for the all <br>platforms, x86, PPC, 32 and 64 bit.<font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#144FAE"><br></font></font></div></blockquote><br></div><div>Thank you very much for packaging this for Fedora.</div><div><br></div><div>Would you mind if I include the RPM spec file in the mod_gnutls repository for inclusion in future releases? (the spec file would be licensed under the ASL 2.0 if you are ok with that)</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>by all means, it'll make it easier for others to rebuild a binary package. unfortunately I don't have a Debian system to build on. it's not difficult to use an RPM specfile to create .deb packages... perhaps someone else can pick up that task. but I guess at least the modern Debian systems can use standard YUM repositories.</div></body></html>